ZORAWARMAL (D) THR. LRS. vs KISHAN VYAS (D) THR. LRS. — C.A. No. 6439/2011

Case under Land Laws, Agricultural Tenancy, Land Revenue : Revenue Laws of States, Including Preemption, Collection of Land Revenue, Mutations, Correction of Land Records, Etc Section XV. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010285122009

Filing Date

17-Sep-2009

Registration No

C.A. No. 6439/2011

Diary Number

28512/2009

Order Date

25-Aug-2017

Document Type

ROP

Last updated 07-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Laws, Agricultural tenancy, Land Revenue : Revenue laws of States, including preemption, collection of land revenue, mutations, correction of land records, etc Section XV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ZORAWARMAL (D) THR. LRS.

    Adv. SURYA KANT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KISHAN VYAS (D) THR. LRS.

    Adv. SURYA KANT PRATIBHA JAIN

Case History

  1. 25-Aug-2017
  2. 25-Aug-2017

    Fixed Date by Court

    Registrar (J) - IV

  3. 18-Apr-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 18-Apr-2017

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 18-Apr-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 03-Apr-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 03-Apr-2017

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 03-Apr-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 09-Dec-2016
  10. 09-Dec-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  11. 09-Dec-2016
  12. 07-Oct-2016
  13. 07-Oct-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  14. 07-Oct-2016
  15. 08-Aug-2016
  16. 08-Aug-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  17. 08-Aug-2016
  18. 05-Aug-2011
  19. 15-Jul-2011
  20. 06-Oct-2010
  21. 04-Oct-2010
  22. 28-Sep-2010
  23. 14-Sep-2010
  24. 27-Jul-2010
  25. 20-Apr-2010
  26. 19-Feb-2010
  27. 30-Oct-2009
  28. 17-Sep-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 6439/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: C.A. No. 006439/2011 (Zorawarmal v. Kishan Vyas) Hearing Date: 25-08-2017 On 25 August 2017, the Registrar heard IA 4/2014 (substitution application) in this civil appeal. The appellant's counsel filed an application to substitute the legal representatives (LRs) of the deceased sole appellant on record. The Registrar allowed the substitution application as it was filed within the prescribed time and directed the Registry to proceed further with the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case