TATA STEEL LTD. vs STATE OF JHARKHAND . — SLP(C) No. 1895/2007

Case under Section XVII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010028512007

Filing Date

25-Jan-2007

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 1895/2007

Diary Number

2851/2007

Order Date

30-Sep-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XVII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TATA STEEL LTD.

    Adv. MANIK KARANJAWALA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND .

    Adv. RATAN KUMAR CHOUDHURI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 06-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 13-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 09-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 21-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 21-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 21-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 08-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 06-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 18-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 13-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 17-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 08-May-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 31-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 03-Dec-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 13-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 03-Oct-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 31-Aug-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 11-Jul-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 30-Apr-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 25-Jan-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 1895/2007

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of SLP(C) No. 001895/2007 - Tata Steel Ltd. v. State of Jharkhand On 30/09/2011, the Supreme Court dismissed Tata Steel's special leave petition challenging the High Court of Jharkhand's November 2006 order. However, the Court granted the petitioner liberty to file a Revision Petition before the Tribunal within four weeks, directing the Tribunal to decide the matter on merits without being bound by limitation periods or the High Court's observations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case