SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA LEGAL OFFICER vs SHINGAR LTD. MANAGING DIRECTOR — C.A. No. 7136/2009
Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010284122009
Filing Date
16-Sep-2009
Registration No
C.A. No. 7136/2009
Diary Number
28412/2009
Order Date
06-Dec-2023
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 07-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA LEGAL OFFICER
Adv. K J JOHN AND CO
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHINGAR LTD. MANAGING DIRECTOR
Adv. R. C. KOHLI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Dec-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Dec-2023
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia
-
31-Aug-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Aug-2023
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.V.N. Bhatti
-
24-Aug-2023
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra
-
23-Aug-2023
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra
-
16-Aug-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Aug-2023
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra
-
10-May-2022
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-May-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Sep-2009
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 7136/2009
The Supreme Court dismissed SEBI's appeal against Shingar Ltd. on December 6, 2023, affirming the Securities Appellate Tribunal's decision. The Court found that SEBI's inquiry notice issued on August 22, 2007, was fatally flawed—it was predicated on the false premise that Shingar had not filed a reply, when the company had undisputedly filed its reply prior to that date, constituting clear non-application of mind that could not be remedied by subsequent proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts