MITHILESH KUMAR PATHAK vs UNION OF INDIA — C.A. No. 4411/2011

Case under Armed Forces and Paramilitary Forces : Slps and Writ Petitions Pertaining to Armed Forces and Paramilitary Forces, Including Recruitment/ Appointment, Court Martial, Disciplinary Action, Pension, Emoluments, Salary and Other Incidental Matters Section XVI. Status: Pending.

Pending

CNR: SCIN010283082010

Filing Date

07-Sep-2010

Registration No

C.A. No. 4411/2011

Diary Number

28308/2010

Order Date

26-Nov-2021

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Last updated 07-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Armed Forces and ParaMilitary Forces : SLPs and Writ Petitions pertaining to armed forces and paramilitary forces, including recruitment/ appointment, court martial, disciplinary action, pension, emoluments, salary and other incidental matters Section XVI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MITHILESH KUMAR PATHAK

    Adv. T. MAHIPAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA

    Adv. N. VISAKAMURTHY[R-1] N. VISAKAMURTHY[R-2] N. VISAKAMURTHY[R-3] N. VISAKAMURTHY[R-4]

Case History

  1. 11-Jan-2022

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna

  2. 26-Nov-2021

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 26-Nov-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 12-Dec-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 05-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 05-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 06-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 21-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 08-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 09-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 11-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 04-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 07-Sep-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 4411/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: On 26-11-2021, the Supreme Court heard an early hearing application (IA No. 32432/2021) filed by appellant Mithilesh Kumar Pathak in Civil Appeal No. 4411/2011 against the Union of India. The Court allowed the application and directed the Registry to list the appeal for hearing after four weeks before the Bench presided over by Justice M.R. Shah. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case