STATE OF HARYANA . vs RAJ KUMAR SHARMA . — C.A. No. 5442 - 5459/2009
Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010028182005
Filing Date
04-Feb-2005
Registration No
C.A. No. 5442 - 5459/2009
Diary Number
2818/2005
Order Date
29-Oct-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA .
Adv. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAJ KUMAR SHARMA .
Adv. A. P. MOHANTY (Dead / Retired / Elevated) R. C. KAUSHIK DEBASIS MISRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Sep-2013
ROPView PDF
-
09-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jul-2013
ROPView PDF
-
17-Jan-2013
ROPView PDF
-
08-Oct-2012
ROPView PDF
-
20-Jun-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jun-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Jan-2010
ROPView PDF
-
07-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Jul-2009
ROPView PDF
-
24-Jul-2009
ROPView PDF
-
09-Jul-2009
ROPView PDF
-
13-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jan-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jan-2009
ROPView PDF
-
22-Aug-2008
ROPView PDF
-
09-May-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Feb-2008
ROPView PDF
-
13-Dec-2007
ROPView PDF
-
04-Dec-2007
ROPView PDF
-
24-Sep-2007
ROPView PDF
-
19-Sep-2007
ROPView PDF
-
03-Aug-2007
ROPView PDF
-
01-Dec-2006
ROPView PDF
-
15-Sep-2006
ROPView PDF
-
28-Aug-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jul-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jul-2006
ROPView PDF
-
17-Apr-2006
ROPView PDF
-
24-Feb-2006
ROPView PDF
-
10-Feb-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jan-2006
ROPView PDF
-
08-Aug-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jul-2005
ROPView PDF
-
21-Jul-2005
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jul-2005
ROPView PDF
-
04-Apr-2005
ROPView PDF
-
04-Apr-2005
ROPView PDF
-
07-Mar-2005
ROPView PDF
-
04-Mar-2005
ROPView PDF
-
14-Feb-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Feb-2005
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 5442 - 5459/2009
Summary of C.A. No. 005442-005459/2009 The Supreme Court held that work-charge service cannot be counted as regular service for purposes of the Haryana Civil Services (Assured Career Progression) Rules, 1998. The Court reversed High Court orders granting work-charge employees benefits under these rules, finding that "regular satisfactory service" explicitly requires recruitment through prescribed procedures, distinguishing it fundamentally from temporary work-charge employment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts