JAGANNATH PRASAD GAUR vs STATE OF U.P. . — SLP(C) No. 26933/2010

Case under Section XI. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010281342010

Filing Date

06-Sep-2010

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 26933/2010

Diary Number

28134/2010

Order Date

18-Apr-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 07-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGANNATH PRASAD GAUR

    Adv. AMBAR QAMARUDDIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF U.P. .

    Adv. ANUVRAT SHARMA M. QAMARUDDIN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 27-Feb-2013
  4. 29-Oct-2012
  5. 02-Jul-2012
  6. 16-Apr-2012
  7. 09-Apr-2012
  8. 08-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 30-Sep-2011
  10. 15-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 16-Aug-2011
  12. 01-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 25-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 19-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 05-Jul-2011
  16. 12-May-2011
  17. 10-May-2011
  18. 09-May-2011
  19. 06-May-2011
  20. 05-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 02-May-2011
  22. 29-Apr-2011
  23. 29-Apr-2011
  24. 21-Apr-2011
  25. 18-Apr-2011
  26. 04-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 01-Apr-2011
  28. 01-Apr-2011
  29. 14-Mar-2011
  30. 07-Mar-2011
  31. 03-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 21-Jan-2011
  33. 13-Dec-2010
  34. 19-Nov-2010
  35. 01-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 06-Sep-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 26933/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: SLP(C) No. 26933/2010 - Jagannath Prasad Gaur v. State of U.P. On 18 April 2013, the Supreme Court heard consolidated petitions challenging a Allahabad High Court judgment (dated 18 August 2010) in a matter involving Uttar Pradesh police constable service rules. The petitioners' counsel submitted that no substantive issues remained for the Court's consideration, and the respondent State did not oppose this position. The Court disposed of all petitions as infructuous, but granted petitioners liberty to challenge Rule 26 of the Uttar Pradesh (Civil Police) Constables and Head Constables Service Rules, 2008 before an appropriate forum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case