VINEET KUMR MISHRA vs STATE OF U.P. THROUGH SECRETARY — C.A. No. 9017/2017
Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010281332010
Filing Date
06-Sep-2010
Registration No
C.A. No. 9017/2017
Diary Number
28133/2010
Order Date
14-Jul-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 07-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VINEET KUMR MISHRA
Adv. SANJAY KUMAR VISEN[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF U.P. THROUGH SECRETARY
Adv. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1] NIRANJANA SINGH (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Jul-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jul-2017
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.A. Bobde and Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao
-
05-Jul-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jul-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Apr-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Apr-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Mar-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Mar-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Feb-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jan-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Jan-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jul-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Oct-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Dec-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Nov-2010
ROPView PDF
-
08-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Sep-2010
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 9017/2017
Summary of C.A. No. 009017/2017 (Dr. Vineet Kumar Mishra v. State of U.P.) The Supreme Court allowed Dr. Vineet Kumar Mishra's appeals against the High Court's August 2010 order that had quashed a 2007 medical college order and directed fresh selection for a Demonstrator post. The Court held that since Mishra was regularized against the permanent post in November 2009 (an order never challenged), quashing the 2007 order would not create a vacancy, making fresh selection improper. The matter was remanded to the High Court for fresh decision in accordance with law, with Respondent Dr. Anand Kumar permitted to apply for amendment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts