MOHAN LAL vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT CHIEF SECRETARY — Crl.A. No. 726/2010

Case under Section II-E. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010279122009

Filing Date

14-Sep-2009

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 726/2010

Diary Number

27912/2009

Order Date

16-Jan-2020

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHAN LAL

    Adv. B. K. SATIJA[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT CHIEF SECRETARY

    Adv. SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jan-2020

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 16-Jan-2020

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari

  4. 19-Sep-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 19-Sep-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 28-Mar-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 05-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 05-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 27-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 27-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 18-Feb-2014
  12. 01-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 14-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 10-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 06-Sep-2010
  16. 05-Apr-2010
  17. 01-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 08-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 27-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 23-Oct-2009
  21. 14-Sep-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 726/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's conviction of appellant Mohan Lal and another under Section 409 read with Section 34 IPC for misappropriation of Rs. 11,000 in 1976, but modified the sentence. Considering the 33-year delay, that the misappropriated amount had been repaid with interest, and the appellants' advanced age (80 and 88 years), the Court commuted their prison sentences to time already served plus a fine of Rs. 5,000 each, with three months additional imprisonment as default punishment if the fine remained unpaid. The appeals were allowed to this extent on January 16, 2020. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case