DEVINDER PAL SINGH . vs MOHINDER SINGH . — SLP(C) No. 2748/2006

Case under Section IV-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010027872006

Filing Date

28-Jan-2006

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 2748/2006

Diary Number

2787/2006

Order Date

06-Dec-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEVINDER PAL SINGH .

    Adv. RUBY SINGH AHUJA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHINDER SINGH .

    Adv. K. K. MOHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Dec-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 04-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 27-Aug-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 15-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 15-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 30-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 06-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 23-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 20-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 23-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 18-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 09-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 28-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 22-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 30-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 11-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 06-Dec-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 14-Sep-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 20-Feb-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 28-Jan-2006

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 2748/2006

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of SLP(C) No. 2748/2006 - Devinder Pal Singh v. Mohinder Singh On 06/12/2013, the Supreme Court allowed I.A. No. 5 and restored the special leave petition to its original number, requiring Rs. 2,000/- deposit with the Supreme Court Employees' Mutual Welfare Fund within three weeks. The Court maintained the interim "status quo" order it had previously granted (20/02/2006) and directed the Trial Court to dispose of the underlying suit for permanent injunction within six months. All contentions of the parties were kept open. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case