MUSTAFA JAMAL vs STATE OF UTTARANCHAL . — SLP(Crl) No. 7207/2008

Case under Section II-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010277342008

Filing Date

23-Sep-2008

Registration No

SLP(Crl) No. 7207/2008

Diary Number

27734/2008

Order Date

25-Feb-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUSTAFA JAMAL

    Adv. EJAZ MAQBOOL HIMINDER LAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARANCHAL .

    Adv. SHAKIL AHMED SYED (Dead / Retired / Elevated) JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Feb-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 11-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 07-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 24-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 03-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 23-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 20-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 02-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 08-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 23-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 19-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 18-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 24-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 08-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 11-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 09-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 22-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 30-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 17-Oct-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 23-Sep-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(Crl) No. 7207/2008

casestatus.in Summary

On 25/02/2013, the Supreme Court heard Mustafa Jamal's SLP(Crl) challenging a 2008 High Court order. The main dispute between petitioner and respondent No.5 was settled, with divorce finalized and appropriate compensation paid to the petitioner's daughter. The Court disposed of CrlMP.No.25124/2012 accordingly, while directing that respondent No.5 may file a separate application under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 regarding visiting rights to his son. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case