UNION OF INDIA vs VIRAJ CHETAN SHAH — SLP(C) No. 17194 - 17230/2024
Case under Others : Matters Not Falling Under Any Other Category. Section IX. Status: PENDING.
CNR: SCIN010277252024
Filing Date
24-06-2024 02:11 PM
Registration No
SLP(C) No. 17194 - 17230/2024
Diary Number
27725/2024
Order Date
06-04-2026
Document Type
ROP
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UNION OF INDIA
Adv. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA
Respondent(s)
VIRAJ CHETAN SHAH
Adv. RAJESH SRIVASTAVA[caveat] [caveat] DACCHITA SHAHI[R-39] RAJEEV MAHESHWARANAND ROY[R-88] VARUN SINGH[R-105] VARUN SINGH[R-106] RAMESH BABU M. R.[R-21] KRISHAN KUMAR[R-11] SIDDHARTH NATH[R-44] RITWIK PARIKH[R-77] PRANAV SARTHI[caveat] VISHNU SHARMA A.S.[R-10] VISHNU SHARMA A.S.[R-9] APOORV SHUKLA[R-83] E. C. AGRAWALA[R-27] SNEHA SANJAY BOTWE [R-71] SNEHA SANJAY BOTWE [R-69] AADITYA ANIRUDDHA PANDE[R-48] AADITYA ANIRUDDHA PANDE[R-107] SACHIN PATIL[caveat] [caveat] [caveat] PALASH SINGHAI[caveat] AAKASHI LODHA [R-40] ARUN AGGARWAL[R-47] MANISH TIWARI RAJESH KUMAR GAUTAM[R-43] RAJESH KUMAR GAUTAM[R-56] RAJESH KUMAR GAUTAM[R-79] P. S. SUDHEER[R-87] O. P. GAGGAR[R-2] O. P. GAGGAR[R-73] O. P. GAGGAR[R-78] ASHISH RANA[R-93] BRIJESH KUMAR TAMBER[R-51] RAHUL GUPTA[caveat] BRIJESH KUMAR TAMBER[R-95]
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
Fixed Date by Court
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-01-2026 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 18-11-2025 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 26-09-2025 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 01-09-2025 | Fixed Date by Court |
| 19-08-2025 | Fixed Date by Court |
Orders in this case
Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 017194-017230/2024 On 07-01-2026, the Registrar heard multiple Special Leave to Appeal petitions filed by the Union of India against Viraj Chetan Shah and others. The Registrar's order addressed procedural matters regarding counter-affidavits: several respondents filed counter-affidavits after their opportunity was declined, some filed defective affidavits despite prior chances, and certain respondents failed to file despite opportunities being granted. The matter has been directed for listing before the Judge-in-Chambers for further directions, and the Registry was directed to verify whether defects in certain applications have been cured and process them accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts