MOHD.ABDUL RAHMAN . vs B.MANORAMA . — SLP(C) No. 30718 - 30719/2008

Case under Section XII-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010274752008

Filing Date

19-Sep-2008

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 30718 - 30719/2008

Diary Number

27475/2008

Order Date

11-May-2012

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHD.ABDUL RAHMAN .

    Adv. LAKSHMI RAMAN SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.B.MANORAMA .

    Adv. RAKESH K. SHARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 14-Dec-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 29-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 19-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 08-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 14-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 01-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 12-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 11-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 06-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 15-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 04-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 26-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 18-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 07-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 19-Sep-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 30718 - 30719/2008

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 030718-030719/2008 The Supreme Court dismissed the petitioners' Special Leave Petitions on 14.12.2011, upholding the Andhra Pradesh High Court's dismissal of their revisions under the Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960. The Court found the Appellate Authority's negative finding on the petitioners' bonafide requirement was based on correct analysis of evidence. On 11.05.2012, the Court further dismissed the petitioners' interim applications seeking direction to the respondent to surrender the ground floor shop, holding the prayer was beyond the scope of the original petitions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case