HARYANA URBAN DEVT.AUTH. vs JAWHAR LAL — C.A. No. 6069/2010
Case under Section XVII-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010271262009
Filing Date
08-Sep-2009
Registration No
C.A. No. 6069/2010
Diary Number
27126/2009
Order Date
09-Dec-2021
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Leave Granted & Allowed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARYANA URBAN DEVT.AUTH.
Adv. RAJESH MAHALE (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.JAWHAR LAL
Adv. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Dec-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Dec-2021
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy
-
23-Sep-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Sep-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Oct-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Dec-2011
ROPView PDF
-
26-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-May-2011
ROPView PDF
-
13-May-2011
ROPView PDF
-
11-May-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Apr-2011
ROPView PDF
-
01-Mar-2011
ROPView PDF
-
18-Feb-2011
ROPView PDF
-
04-Feb-2011
ROPView PDF
-
02-Aug-2010
ROPView PDF
-
26-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-May-2010
ROPView PDF
-
03-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Sep-2009
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 6069/2010
SUMMARY In CA 6069/2010, the Supreme Court allowed HUDA's appeal, setting aside the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's March 4, 2009 order. HUDA received a 1981 offer letter for a residential plot but never issued formal allotment. Respondent Jawhar Lal filed a consumer complaint in 2000; the District Forum directed plot allotment at Rs.125/sq.yard, upheld by state authorities. The Supreme Court reversed this, finding no actual allotment followed the offer letter and the discretionary quota policy had been abolished. The respondent's complaint was dismissed with no compensation awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts