SOHAN SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH PROPOSED LR. vs STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY DEPT. OF PANCHAYATS AND RURAL DEV. — C.A. No. 6991/2014

Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010270312003

Filing Date

18-Dec-2003

Registration No

C.A. No. 6991/2014

Diary Number

27031/2003

Order Date

16-Sep-2025

Document Type

Judgement - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 01-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SOHAN SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH PROPOSED LR.

    Adv. K. K. MOHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY DEPT. OF PANCHAYATS AND RURAL DEV.

    Adv. UGRA SHANKAR PRASAD (Dead / Retired / Elevated) MONIKA GUSAIN (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1] B. K. SATIJA[R-2] HIMANSHU SHARMA[R-3]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Feb-2022

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Ramasubramanian

  3. 22-Feb-2022

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Ramasubramanian

  4. 17-Feb-2022

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Ramasubramanian

  5. 16-Feb-2022

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Ramasubramanian

  6. 15-Feb-2022

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Ramasubramanian

  7. 11-Jan-2022

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Ramasubramanian

  8. 28-Oct-2021

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Ramasubramanian

  9. 02-Sep-2021

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Ramasubramanian

  10. 12-Feb-2020

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy

  11. 11-Feb-2020

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  12. 06-Feb-2020

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer

  13. 05-Feb-2020

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  14. 04-Feb-2020

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  15. 30-Jan-2020

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  16. 29-Jan-2020

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  17. 28-Jan-2020

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  18. 21-Jan-2020

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  19. 16-Jan-2020

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  20. 15-Jan-2020

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  21. 24-Jul-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  22. 23-Jul-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  23. 16-Jul-2019

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  24. 30-Apr-2019

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha

  25. 30-Apr-2019

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph

  26. 12-Feb-2019

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph

  27. 09-Jan-2019

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph

  28. 23-Jan-2018

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

  29. 05-Dec-2017

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

  30. 05-Oct-2017

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Madan B. Lokur, Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

  31. 12-Jul-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 05-May-2017
  33. 05-May-2017

    Office ReportView PDF

  34. 05-May-2017
  35. 17-Feb-2017
  36. 17-Feb-2017

    Office ReportView PDF

  37. 17-Feb-2017
  38. 01-Dec-2016
  39. 01-Dec-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  40. 01-Dec-2016
  41. 15-Nov-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  42. 15-Nov-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  43. 21-Oct-2016
  44. 21-Oct-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  45. 21-Oct-2016
  46. 05-Aug-2016
  47. 05-Aug-2016
  48. 01-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  49. 01-Aug-2016
  50. 01-Aug-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  51. 01-Aug-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  52. 01-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  53. 01-Aug-2016
  54. 25-Jul-2016
  55. 25-Jul-2016
  56. 15-Jul-2016
  57. 15-Jul-2016

    Office ReportView PDF

  58. 15-Jul-2016
  59. 18-Apr-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  60. 18-Apr-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  61. 18-Apr-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  62. 24-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  63. 24-Feb-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  64. 24-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  65. 03-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  66. 03-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  67. 05-May-2015
  68. 05-May-2015

    Office ReportView PDF

  69. 05-May-2015
  70. 18-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  71. 25-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  72. 20-Jan-2014
  73. 28-Oct-2013
  74. 05-Sep-2013
  75. 31-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  76. 05-Nov-2012
  77. 03-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  78. 13-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  79. 01-Mar-2012
  80. 17-Jan-2012
  81. 16-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  82. 01-Dec-2011
  83. 18-Jul-2011
  84. 24-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  85. 21-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  86. 22-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  87. 07-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  88. 16-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  89. 05-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  90. 15-Mar-2010
  91. 02-May-2008
  92. 25-Apr-2008
  93. 03-Apr-2008
  94. 06-Aug-2007
  95. 09-Apr-2007
  96. 26-Feb-2007
  97. 31-Jan-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  98. 06-Dec-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  99. 17-Apr-2006
  100. 13-Feb-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  101. 27-Jan-2006
  102. 06-Jan-2006
  103. 21-Nov-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  104. 02-Sep-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  105. 12-Jul-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  106. 04-May-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  107. 31-Mar-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  108. 17-Feb-2005

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  109. 04-Feb-2005
  110. 28-Apr-2004
  111. 20-Apr-2004
  112. 18-Dec-2003

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 6991/2014

  113. [ 2025 INSC 1122 ]

    Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of State of Haryana v. Jai Singh (C.A. No. 006991/2014) Court Decision The Supreme Court of India dismissed the State of Haryana's appeal, upholding the High Court's judgment that unutilized land ("bachat land") contributed by proprietors during consolidation proceedings must revert to them, not vest with the Gram Panchayat. Key Findings The Court held that: - Land reserved for common purposes under consolidation schemes vests with the Gram Panchayat - Bachat land (land earmarked but not utilized for common purposes) remains the proprietors' property in proportion to their contributions - The 1992 Haryana amendment expanding "shamilat deh" definition does not alter this principle - Consistent precedent from 100+ High Court judgments supports this interpretation Constitutional Reasoning - Constitution Bench judgments (*Ajit Singh*, *Bhagat Ram*) distinguish between "acquisition by the State" (which requires compensation) and mere "modification of rights" (which does not) - Land reserved for Panchayat income violates Article 31-A's second proviso - The doctrine of *stare decisis* applies—longstanding judicial views cannot be disturbed without compelling reason This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case