UNION OF INDIA vs MEWA RAM (D) BY LRS. — C.A. No. 5322/2014
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010026762005
Filing Date
02-Feb-2005
Registration No
C.A. No. 5322/2014
Diary Number
2676/2005
Order Date
30-Apr-2014
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA
Adv. ANIL KATIYAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.MEWA RAM (D) BY LRS.
Adv. SAHARYA & CO.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Apr-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Mar-2014
ROPView PDF
-
05-Dec-2013
ROPView PDF
-
27-Aug-2013
ROPView PDF
-
13-Feb-2013
ROPView PDF
-
15-Oct-2012
ROPView PDF
-
03-Sep-2012
ROPView PDF
-
20-Jul-2012
ROPView PDF
-
16-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
21-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
11-Nov-2011
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jul-2011
ROPView PDF
-
04-Mar-2011
ROPView PDF
-
23-Feb-2011
ROPView PDF
-
08-Nov-2010
ROPView PDF
-
23-Jul-2010
ROPView PDF
-
13-Jul-2010
ROPView PDF
-
29-Mar-2010
ROPView PDF
-
29-Jul-2009
ROPView PDF
-
08-Aug-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-May-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Apr-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Apr-2007
ROPView PDF
-
26-Apr-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Feb-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Sep-2005
ROPView PDF
-
01-Aug-2005
ROPView PDF
-
18-Jul-2005
ROPView PDF
-
11-Apr-2005
ROPView PDF
-
28-Mar-2005
ROPView PDF
-
14-Mar-2005
ROPView PDF
-
11-Mar-2005
ROPView PDF
-
25-Feb-2005
ROPView PDF
-
11-Feb-2005
ROPView PDF
-
02-Feb-2005
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 5322/2014
-
17-Jan-2005
ROPView PDF
-
06-Jan-2005
ROPView PDF
Case Summary: C.A. No. 005322/2014 Union of India v. Mewa Ram (D) by LRS. In this land acquisition compensation case, the Supreme Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal challenging the High Court's judgment of July 26, 2002, which had increased compensation for acquired lands in Delhi villages (Beharipur and Karawal Nagar) to Rs. 7,500-8,000 per bigha, from the LAO's original award of Rs. 1,500-3,500 per bigha. Finding no error in the High Court's reasoning, the Court affirmed the higher compensation amount with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts