MAHARASHI DAYANAND UNIV.ROHTAK vs AJAY KUMAR . — SLP(C) No. 25578/2009

Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010267242009

Filing Date

04-Sep-2009

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 25578/2009

Diary Number

26724/2009

Order Date

16-Oct-2012

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section I-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHARASHI DAYANAND UNIV.ROHTAK

    Adv. S. JANANI (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AJAY KUMAR .

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 04-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 23-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 20-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 22-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 13-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 01-Dec-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 31-Oct-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 31-Oct-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 15-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 17-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 12-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 02-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 18-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 18-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 27-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 23-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 11-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 08-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 08-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 02-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 11-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 26-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 04-Sep-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 25578/2009

casestatus.in Summary

On 16/10/2012, the Supreme Court heard SLP(C) No. 25578/2009 filed by Maharashi Dayanand University, Rohtak against Ajay Kumar, challenging a Punjab & Haryana High Court order from 30/05/2009. Justice Swatanter Kumar dismissed the petition after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the special leave petitions had become infructuous (serving no purpose). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case