STATE OF H.P. . vs RAVINDER BALORIA . — C.A. No. 633/2007

Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010026422006

Filing Date

27-Jan-2006

Registration No

C.A. No. 633/2007

Diary Number

2642/2006

Order Date

20-Sep-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XIV-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF H.P. .

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAVINDER BALORIA .

    Adv. RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON E. C. VIDYA SAGAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 28-Jun-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 19-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 03-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 21-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 02-Dec-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 12-Dec-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 25-Jan-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 02-Nov-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 18-Oct-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 20-Feb-2006

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 27-Jan-2006

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 633/2007

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of H.P. v. Ravinder Baloria Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed the State's appeal on September 20, 2011, setting aside the High Court's judgment regarding the 15 marks awarded for personal interviews in JBT course admissions. The Court held the interview weightage justified and not arbitrary, dismissing the respondents' challenge to it. Key Facts: Himachal Pradesh conducted a common entrance test for 1,800 Junior Basic Teacher (JBT) positions with marks distributed across written test, interview (15 marks), rural area bonus (10 marks), and other criteria. Ravinder Baloria challenged both the rural area bonus and interview weightage as unjustified. Court Reasoning: The Supreme Court distinguished between interview weightage for educational admissions versus recruitment, noting that JBT graduates received automatic state employment. The 15 interview marks were broken down objectively—5 marks for 10+2 scores, 5 for extracurricular activities, 2 for HP knowledge, and only 3 discretionary marks—with a high-level committee reducing arbitrariness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case