SHANTANU SITARAM @ ANIL DIVEKAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY — Crl.A. No. 724/2012
Case under Section II-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010262002011
Filing Date
20-Aug-2011
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 724/2012
Diary Number
26200/2011
Order Date
22-Sep-2017
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2017 INSC 981
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 07-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHANTANU SITARAM @ ANIL DIVEKAR
Adv. SHEKHAR KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Sep-2017
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Sep-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
12-Sep-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Sep-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
08-Sep-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Sep-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
07-Sep-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Sep-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
05-Sep-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Sep-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
31-Aug-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Aug-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
30-Aug-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
29-Aug-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
24-Aug-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
23-Aug-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
22-Aug-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
17-Aug-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
16-Aug-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
10-Aug-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
09-Aug-2017
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan
-
27-Jul-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Feb-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jul-2016
ROPView PDF
-
04-Jul-2016
ROPView PDF
-
01-Dec-2015
Office ReportView PDF
-
24-Nov-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Nov-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Sep-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jan-2015
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jan-2015
Office ReportView PDF
-
19-Jan-2015
ROPView PDF
-
18-Dec-2014
ROPView PDF
-
26-Sep-2014
ROPView PDF
-
26-Sep-2014
ROPView PDF
-
10-Mar-2014
ROPView PDF
-
05-Aug-2013
ROPView PDF
-
30-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jan-2012
ROPView PDF
-
06-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Dec-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Oct-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
20-Aug-2011
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 724/2012
-
[ 2017 INSC 981 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
Case Summary: Shantanu Sitaram @ Anil Divekar v. The State of Maharashtra Court Decision: The Supreme Court dismissed both criminal appeals, upholding the conviction of all three accused under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC (murder with common intention) and Section 201 IPC (destruction of evidence). Key Facts & Reasoning: On December 23, 2000, Shantanu took his wife Supriya for a car ride; she was found strangled near Shamgaon Ghat and died. The Court rejected Shantanu's defense claim of robbery by unknown persons, finding overwhelming evidence of conspiracy: witness testimony placing all three accused together before the crime, recovery of victim's gold ornaments from accused Rafik's associate, medical evidence confirming ligature marks matched recovered rope, and false statements by the accused denying knowledge of each other. The Court held that acquittal under Section 120B (conspiracy) does not negate conviction under Section 302 with common intention, as both charges were substantively proved through oral, medical, and circumstantial evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts