IBRAHIM ISMAIL BHATTI vs STATE OF GUJARAT CHIEF SECRETARY — Crl.A. No. 504/2012

Case under Section II-E. Status: Sclsc Disposed.

Sclsc Disposed

CNR: SCIN010260592011

Filing Date

19-Aug-2011

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 504/2012

Diary Number

26059/2011

Order Date

06-Dec-2023

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 07-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.IBRAHIM ISMAIL BHATTI

    Adv. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT CHIEF SECRETARY

    Adv. SWATI GHILDIYAL [R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Dec-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 06-Dec-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Mithal

  4. 06-Dec-2023

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Mithal

  5. 05-Oct-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 05-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 14-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 21-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 23-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 12-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 27-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 13-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 16-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 30-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 19-Aug-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 504/2012

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Ibrahim Ismail Bhatti v. State of Gujarat (Crl.A. 504/2012) The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's conviction appeal for murder (IPC Section 302) of his wife in a 1992 dowry death case. The Court upheld the lower courts' reliance on three dying declarations (one oral, two written), rejecting arguments that they were unreliable or fraudulently recorded, and found no evidentiary weakness despite two prosecution witnesses being declared hostile. The Court directed the appellant to surrender within one month to serve the remaining sentence, while granting him pre-mature release eligibility after completing 14 years of actual imprisonment as conceded by the State. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case