KARPAGAM vs E.PURUSHOTHAMAN AND ORS — SLP(C) No. 28107/2010

Case under Section XII. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010257422010

Filing Date

16-Aug-2010

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 28107/2010

Diary Number

25742/2010

Order Date

05-Sep-2017

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed with peremptory order

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XII

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KARPAGAM

    Adv. MALINI PODUVAL (Expired)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.E.PURUSHOTHAMAN AND ORS

    Adv. SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Sep-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 05-Sep-2017

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph

  4. 19-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 19-Jan-2017

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 19-Jan-2017

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 05-Dec-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 05-Dec-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 05-Dec-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 07-Nov-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 07-Nov-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 07-Nov-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 21-Sep-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 21-Sep-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 21-Sep-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 09-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 09-Aug-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 09-Aug-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 30-Jun-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 30-Jun-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 04-Apr-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 04-Apr-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 04-Apr-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 12-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 12-Feb-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 12-Feb-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 04-Dec-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 04-Dec-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 17-Sep-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 17-Sep-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 17-Sep-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 10-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 10-Jul-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 10-Jul-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 20-Mar-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 20-Mar-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  37. 13-Jan-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 13-Jan-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  39. 13-Jan-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  40. 29-Oct-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  41. 29-Oct-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  42. 29-Oct-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  43. 12-Aug-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  44. 12-Aug-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  45. 23-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  46. 20-Jan-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  47. 02-Dec-2013

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  48. 02-Dec-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  49. 25-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  50. 31-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  51. 11-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  52. 02-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  53. 09-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  54. 21-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  55. 18-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  56. 18-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  57. 06-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  58. 05-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  59. 25-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  60. 25-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  61. 25-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  62. 27-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  63. 16-Aug-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 28107/2010

View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 28107/2010 On 05-09-2017, Justice Kurian Joseph heard the petition of Karpagam against E. Purushothaman and others. The Court granted the petitioner four weeks to comply with the Office Report dated 13.04.2017. If the petitioner fails to comply within this timeframe, the petition will be dismissed without further reference to the Court, and any restoration application will require payment of Rs. 1,000 as costs to the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case