SANTOSH vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY — Crl.A. No. 569/2010

Case under Section II-E. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010256152009

Filing Date

27-Aug-2009

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 569/2010

Diary Number

25615/2009

Order Date

03-Sep-2019

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANTOSH

    Adv. S. K. VERMA[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY

    Adv. SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI (Dead / Retired / Elevated) [R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Sep-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 03-Sep-2019

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy

  4. 29-Aug-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 29-Aug-2019

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indira Banerjee

  6. 27-Aug-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 20-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 22-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 11-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 21-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 10-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 07-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 27-Aug-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 569/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Crl.A. No. 569/2010 (Santosh v. State of Madhya Pradesh) The Supreme Court dismissed Santosh's appeal against his Section 302 IPC (murder) conviction for a February 1991 knife assault that caused the victim's death. The appellant argued the assault was provoked and unintentional, seeking downgrade to Section 304 Part II IPC, but the Court found the single knife wound extremely severe—piercing the stomach membrane, cutting intestines, and causing additional injuries to the neck and ribs—rejecting claims of provocation. His bail bonds were cancelled and he was directed to surrender immediately to serve his remaining sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case