U.T. CHANDIGARH . vs SAMPAT . — C.A. No. 6779/2009

Case under Section IV. Status: DISPOSED.

CNR: SCIN010025292005

DISPOSED

Filing Date

01-Feb-2005

Registration No

C.A. No. 6779/2009

Diary Number

2529/2005

Order Date

03-Apr-2014

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Data as of 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV

Petitioner(s)

U.T. CHANDIGARH .

Adv. JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA

Respondent(s)

SAMPAT .

Adv. P. N. PURI

Orders

01-Apr-2014 Office Report
17-Dec-2013 ROP
30-Sep-2013 Office Report
30-Sep-2013 ROP
26-Aug-2013 ROP
29-Jul-2013 ROP
10-May-2013 ROP
09-Apr-2013 ROP
08-Mar-2013 ROP
03-Dec-2012 ROP
06-Jul-2012 ROP
28-Nov-2011 ROP
11-Oct-2011 ROP
17-Aug-2011 ROP
06-May-2011 ROP
30-Mar-2009 ROP
18-Feb-2009 ROP
18-Feb-2009 ROP
11-Feb-2009 ROP
05-Feb-2009 ROP
14-Jan-2009 ROP
12-Dec-2008 ROP
28-Nov-2008 ROP
16-Oct-2008 ROP
25-Sep-2008 ROP
03-Sep-2008 ROP
21-Aug-2008 ROP
30-Jul-2008 ROP
15-Jul-2008 ROP
10-Jul-2008 ROP
13-May-2008 ROP
12-May-2008 ROP
23-Apr-2008 ROP
22-Apr-2008 ROP
03-Apr-2008 ROP
28-Mar-2008 ROP
13-Mar-2008 ROP
25-Feb-2008 ROP
08-Feb-2008 ROP
07-Feb-2008 ROP
23-Jan-2008 ROP
28-Nov-2007 ROP
15-Nov-2007 ROP
22-Oct-2007 ROP
09-Oct-2007 ROP
05-Oct-2007 ROP
24-Sep-2007 ROP
23-Aug-2007 ROP
22-Aug-2007 ROP
18-May-2007 ROP
18-May-2007 ROP
18-May-2007 ROP
16-May-2007 ROP
01-May-2007 ROP
29-Mar-2007 ROP
20-Feb-2007 ROP
20-Feb-2007 ROP
20-Feb-2007 ROP
07-Feb-2007 ROP
19-Jan-2007 ROP
15-Jan-2007 ROP
29-Nov-2006 ROP
29-Nov-2006 ROP
09-Nov-2006 ROP
12-Oct-2006 ROP
12-Oct-2006 ROP
12-Oct-2006 ROP
11-Oct-2006 ROP
31-Aug-2006 ROP
31-Aug-2006 ROP
31-Aug-2006 ROP
31-Aug-2006 ROP
27-Jul-2006 ROP
27-Jul-2006 ROP
26-Jul-2006 ROP
26-Jul-2006 ROP
13-Jul-2006 ROP
13-Jul-2006 ROP
13-Jul-2006 ROP
13-Jul-2006 ROP
06-Jul-2006 ROP
02-Jan-2006 ROP
29-Aug-2005 ROP
25-Jul-2005 ROP
25-Jul-2005 ROP
25-Jul-2005 ROP
25-Jul-2005 ROP
25-Jul-2005 ROP
25-Jul-2005 ROP
25-Jul-2005 ROP
25-Jul-2005 ROP
09-May-2005 ROP
09-May-2005 ROP
09-May-2005 ROP
09-May-2005 ROP
09-May-2005 ROP
09-May-2005 ROP
09-May-2005 ROP
09-May-2005 ROP
07-Mar-2005 ROP
28-Feb-2005 ROP
View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 006779/2009 The Supreme Court dismissed Chandigarh Administration's appeals challenging a High Court judgment that affirmed the Central Administrative Tribunal's orders directing regularization of work-charge/casual/daily wage employees' services and payment of pension and family pension benefits. The Court upheld regularization, directing that employees with 25+ years of service must be regularized or continued with full salary, dearness allowance, and pensionary benefits under CPWD rules; those already regularized receive regular employee benefits including gratuity and pension; and widows receive family pension. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Supreme Court of India All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case