COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE vs M/S BHEL THROUGH DIRECTOR — C.A. No. 8490/2009
Case under Section I-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010243772009
Filing Date
18-Aug-2009
Registration No
C.A. No. 8490/2009
Diary Number
24377/2009
Order Date
07-Feb-2018
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE
Adv. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/S BHEL THROUGH DIRECTOR
Adv. NARESH KUMAR[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Feb-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Feb-2018
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi
-
31-Jan-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Jan-2018
Administrative Order
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi
-
30-Jan-2018
Administrative Order
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi
-
24-Jan-2018
Administrative Order
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi
-
18-Jan-2018
Administrative Order
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi
-
17-Jan-2018
Administrative Order
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi
-
14-Dec-2017
Administrative Order
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi
-
07-Dec-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Aug-2009
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 8490/2009
Case Summary: Commissioner of Central Excise v. M/S BHEL Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed the Commissioner's appeal on 7 February 2018, upholding lower authorities' decision that boiler components cleared by BHEL as parts but essential for boiler operation should be classified under tariff sub-heading 8402.10 (10% duty) rather than 8402.90 (15% duty for parts). Reasoning: The Court relied on expert opinion from the Ministry of Commerce defining essential boiler components (drum, fittings, mountings) and HSN tariff notes providing that unassembled machines transported in parts for convenience must be classified as complete machines if components are essential to their function, not as separate parts. Next Steps: No further directions were given; the matter concluded with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts