LAKHICHAND RAM KUMAR vs COMMEISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAX — C.A. No. 9745 - 9746/2010

Case under Indirect Taxation : Value Added Tax (Vat), State Sales Tax Act Section III-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010238792009

Filing Date

12-Aug-2009

Registration No

C.A. No. 9745 - 9746/2010

Diary Number

23879/2009

Order Date

13-Nov-2024

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Indirect Taxation : Value Added Tax (VAT), State Sales Tax Act Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAKHICHAND RAM KUMAR

    Adv. ROHIT AMIT STHALEKAR[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.COMMEISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAX

    Adv. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Nov-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 13-Nov-2024

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan

  4. 08-Oct-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 08-Oct-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 08-Oct-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 09-Sep-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 09-Sep-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 09-Sep-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 01-Aug-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 29-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 15-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 18-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 20-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 13-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 25-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 10-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 09-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 09-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 27-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 17-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 23-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 18-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 12-Aug-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 9745 - 9746/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Lakhichand Ram Kumar v. Commissioner of Commercial Tax, U.P. Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed both civil appeals on 13 November 2024, upholding the High Court's decision. The Court found no substantial question of law requiring intervention and ruled that amounts deposited by the appellant while importing coal without Form 31 under the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 must be treated as a composition fee, not security, in accordance with the 26 September 2002 circular. Key Finding: The circular explicitly states that payments made under its provisions must be accepted as penal composition amounts rather than security deposits. The Court noted this circular's validity had been previously upheld in an Allahabad High Court writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case