UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS SECRETARY vs SUSHIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA — SLP(C) No. 24303/2010

Case under Section XI. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010235832010

Filing Date

28-Jul-2010

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 24303/2010

Diary Number

23583/2010

Order Date

18-Oct-2022

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS SECRETARY

    Adv. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUSHIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

    Adv. JYOTI MENDIRATTA HARISH PANDEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Oct-2022

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 18-Oct-2022

    Mention Memo

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka

  4. 14-Nov-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 08-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 08-Jul-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 08-Jul-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 06-Jan-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 06-Jan-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 06-Jan-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 28-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 21-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 29-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 22-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 05-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 28-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 05-Jan-2011
  18. 26-Nov-2010
  19. 13-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 28-Jul-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 24303/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 24303/2010 On 18 October 2022, the Supreme Court heard the Union of India's special leave petition challenging the High Court of Allahabad's 13 October 2009 judgment in favor of Sushil Kumar Srivastava. The Court condoned the delay in filing and dismissed all petitions for special leave to appeal, declining to interfere with the impugned High Court judgment. The petitioner was granted eight weeks to comply with the High Court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case