STATE BANK OF INDIA . vs AJAY PANDEY . — SLP(C) No. 26320/2008

Case under Section XV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010234312008

Filing Date

18-Aug-2008

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 26320/2008

Diary Number

23431/2008

Order Date

16-Dec-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE BANK OF INDIA .

    Adv. A. V. RANGAM (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AJAY PANDEY .

    Adv. SUDARSHAN RAJAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Dec-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 08-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 10-Oct-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 16-Sep-2011
  6. 08-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 29-Jul-2011
  8. 29-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 26-Nov-2010
  10. 09-Aug-2010
  11. 13-May-2010
  12. 25-Mar-2010
  13. 27-Jan-2010
  14. 11-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 10-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 01-Dec-2009
  17. 27-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 16-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 27-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 08-Oct-2009
  21. 20-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 16-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 11-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 16-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 09-Apr-2009
  26. 27-Mar-2009
  27. 20-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 04-Dec-2008
  29. 12-Nov-2008
  30. 17-Oct-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 01-Sep-2008
  32. 18-Aug-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 26320/2008

  33. 14-Jul-2008
casestatus.in Summary

On 16/12/2011, the Supreme Court heard SLP(C) No. 26320/2008 (State Bank of India v. Ajay Pandey) along with related petitions. The Court condoned the delay in filing and disposed of all special leave petitions after counsel for the petitioner banks confirmed they had installed bilingual electronic equipment and filed respective status reports, finding no further adjudication necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case