VIJAY SADASHIV SAPTE vs RAMCHANDRA HARI PAWAR . — SLP(C) No. 28165 - 28166/2009

Case under Section IX. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010233552009

Filing Date

07-Aug-2009

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 28165 - 28166/2009

Diary Number

23355/2009

Order Date

26-Jul-2010

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IX

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIJAY SADASHIV SAPTE

    Adv. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMCHANDRA HARI PAWAR .

    Adv. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 12-Jul-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 07-May-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 12-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 26-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 08-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 11-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 26-Oct-2009
  10. 10-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 07-Aug-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 28165 - 28166/2009

  12. 20-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 04-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 31-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 06-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 22-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 15-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: SLP(C) No. 028165-028166/2009 On 26/07/2010, the Supreme Court disposed of the special leave petitions filed by Vijay Sadashiv Sapte (consolidated with another SLP) after the parties reached an amicable settlement. The petitioner agreed to pay Rs. 20 lakhs to the respondent in three monthly installments (Sept-Nov 2010) in exchange for her vacating the disputed Mumbai property and relinquishing all claims. The respondent was directed to file an undertaking within three weeks confirming vacation by December 31, 2010, and transfer vacant possession to the petitioner without transferring rights to third parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case