ASHOK MATAPRASAD YADAV vs ANUPAM DEVELOPERS . — C.A. No. 3557/2010

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010229322008

Filing Date

12-Aug-2008

Registration No

C.A. No. 3557/2010

Diary Number

22932/2008

Order Date

19-Apr-2010

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK MATAPRASAD YADAV

    Adv. M. J. PAUL (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANUPAM DEVELOPERS .

    Adv. SHRISH KUMAR MISRA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) GAURAV AGRAWAL (Dead / Retired / Elevated) RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSURE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 12-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 19-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 15-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 23-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 09-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 05-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 23-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 23-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 13-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 05-Feb-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 29-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 12-Aug-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 3557/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 003557/2010 The Supreme Court granted leave and disposed of Ashok Mataprasad Yadav's appeal against the High Court of Bombay's dismissal of his appeal concerning Special Civil Suit No. 140 of 2007. The Court modified the trial court's status quo/injunction order to permit Yadav to construct the plot under a tripartite agreement dated 23/3/2007 with CIDCO, but barred him from claiming any equity from such construction; all construction activities remain governed by the pending suit's outcome. Yadav was required to file an undertaking within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case