BOARD OF TRUSTEES PORT OF MUMBAI VIJAY DEEP THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY vs RAMKRISHNA SHIVRAM GADEKAR — C.A. No. 3138 - 3139/2010

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010226502009

Filing Date

31-Jul-2009

Registration No

C.A. No. 3138 - 3139/2010

Diary Number

22650/2009

Order Date

23-Jul-2020

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BOARD OF TRUSTEES PORT OF MUMBAI VIJAY DEEP THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY

    Adv. A. V. RANGAM (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMKRISHNA SHIVRAM GADEKAR

    Adv. ANIL KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Jul-2020

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 23-Jul-2020

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose

  4. 05-Mar-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 01-May-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 05-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 28-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 09-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 28-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 31-Jul-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 3138 - 3139/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Board of Trustees Port of Mumbai v. Ramkrishna Shivram Gadekar The Supreme Court disposed of the Port Authority's appeals on July 23, 2020, upholding the respondent's reinstatement but denying back wages. While acknowledging the serious charges of complicity in a silk theft, the Court found that the respondent had already worked and retired pursuant to its interim reinstatement order, making back wages unrecoverable. The respondent retains all salary earned and retiral benefits accrued during reinstatement, with parties bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case