M/S GOAN REAL ESTATE & CONSTRN.LD.. vs PEOPLE'S MOVEMENT FOR CIVIC ACTION — C.A. No. 5282/2008
Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010225442008
Filing Date
07-Aug-2008
Registration No
C.A. No. 5282/2008
Diary Number
22544/2008
Order Date
07-Apr-2014
Document Type
ROP
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S GOAN REAL ESTATE & CONSTRN.LD..
Adv. E. C. AGRAWALA
Respondent(s)
-
1.PEOPLE'S MOVEMENT FOR CIVIC ACTION
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2014
ROPView PDF
-
31-Mar-2010
JudgmentView PDF
-
31-Mar-2010
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Mar-2010
JudgmentView PDF
-
31-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Mar-2010
ROPView PDF
-
31-Mar-2010
ROPView PDF
-
19-Jan-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Dec-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Nov-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Oct-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-May-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Mar-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Mar-2009
ROPView PDF
-
17-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Nov-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Oct-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Oct-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Oct-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Aug-2008
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Aug-2008
JudgmentView PDF
-
28-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Aug-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Aug-2008
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 5282/2008
-
28-Jul-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jul-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
On 7 April 2014, the Supreme Court heard I.A. No. 3 in Writ Petition 329 of 2008 filed by Goan Real Estate & Construction Ltd. against the Union of India's Ministry of Environment. The petitioner's senior counsel sought and was granted permission to withdraw the application. The Court noted that a two-Judge High Court Bench had already decided the matter with disagreement, and referred it to a third Judge, observing that all points raised in the petition could be pursued before that Judge. I.A. No. 3 was disposed of as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts