N.T.R. UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES vs A. RAJ KARAN REDDY — C.A. No. 4760/2010
Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010223792003
Filing Date
28-Oct-2003
Registration No
C.A. No. 4760/2010
Diary Number
22379/2003
Order Date
30-Nov-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.N.T.R. UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES
Adv. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.A. RAJ KARAN REDDY
Adv. Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO D. MAHESH BABU VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-5] [Pr] Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO[R-9] [Pr]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Nov-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Nov-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
-
18-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Nov-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Oct-2012
ROPView PDF
-
29-Oct-2012
ROPView PDF
-
14-May-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Mar-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Sep-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Aug-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-May-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jan-2009
ROPView PDF
-
18-Jul-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-May-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Mar-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Feb-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Jan-2008
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Nov-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Oct-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Sep-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
31-Aug-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-May-2007
ROPView PDF
-
12-May-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Aug-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Mar-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Feb-2004
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Oct-2003
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 4760/2010
On November 30, 2017, the Supreme Court of India heard Civil Appeal No. 4760 of 2010 filed by N.T.R. University of Health Sciences against A. Raj Karan Reddy and others (consolidated with C.A. Nos. 4761/2010 and 4762/2010). After hearing counsel for both parties, the Court dismissed all three appeals as infructuous, meaning they had become devoid of purpose or benefit. No further directions or next steps were mentioned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts