PUNIA DEVI vs OM PRAKASH PODDAR . — SLP(C) No. 23811/2010

Case under Section COMPUTER CELL. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010222582010

Filing Date

19-Jul-2010

Registration No

SLP(C) No. 23811/2010

Diary Number

22258/2010

Order Date

04-Mar-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section COMPUTER CELL

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PUNIA DEVI

    Adv. MOHIT KUMAR SHAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.OM PRAKASH PODDAR .

    Adv. T. MAHIPAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 15-Jan-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 05-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 10-Oct-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 07-Sep-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 09-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 27-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 07-May-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 09-Apr-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 19-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 13-Feb-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 20-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 07-Dec-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 08-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 22-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 29-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 22-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 09-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 30-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 19-Jul-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. SLP(C) No. 23811/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SLP(C) No. 023811/2010 Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed Punia Devi's special leave petition challenging the Patna High Court's judgment dated 15.04.2010. The Court found that the trial court and lower appellate court's concurrent judgments upholding specific performance in respondent Om Prakash Poddar's suit were based on correct analysis of pleadings and evidence, and the High Court committed no error in refusing to interfere. Next Steps: None; the petition has been conclusively dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case