RAJ KUMAR . vs STATE OF HARYANA — C.A. No. 3702/2014

Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010219592011

Filing Date

18-Jul-2011

Registration No

C.A. No. 3702/2014

Diary Number

21959/2011

Order Date

27-Feb-2014

Document Type

ROP

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 06-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJ KUMAR .

    Adv. SHIEL SETHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

    Adv. ANUBHA AGRAWAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Feb-2014
  3. 20-Feb-2014
  4. 30-Jan-2014
  5. 24-Jan-2014
  6. 13-Jan-2014
  7. 06-Dec-2013
  8. 22-Nov-2013
  9. 04-Oct-2013
  10. 16-Sep-2013
  11. 09-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 02-Sep-2013
  13. 27-Aug-2013
  14. 19-Jul-2013
  15. 09-Jul-2013
  16. 01-Jul-2013
  17. 02-May-2013
  18. 26-Apr-2013
  19. 02-Apr-2013
  20. 01-Apr-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 21-Mar-2013
  22. 18-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 14-Feb-2013
  24. 12-Feb-2013
  25. 17-Jan-2013
  26. 07-Jan-2013
  27. 20-Nov-2012
  28. 05-Nov-2012
  29. 29-Oct-2012
  30. 21-Sep-2012
  31. 10-Sep-2012
  32. 23-Jul-2012
  33. 23-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 16-Jul-2012
  35. 02-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 30-Mar-2012
  37. 16-Mar-2012
  38. 02-Mar-2012
  39. 01-Mar-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  40. 03-Feb-2012
  41. 06-Jan-2012
  42. 16-Dec-2011
  43. 25-Nov-2011
  44. 31-Oct-2011
  45. 16-Sep-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  46. 05-Sep-2011
  47. 05-Aug-2011
  48. 18-Jul-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 3702/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary In this Special Leave to Appeal hearing on 20/02/2014, the Supreme Court heard petitioners Rajinder Singh & Others' challenge to a High Court of Punjab & Haryana order dated 13/12/2012. Justice Kurian Joseph directed that if the petitioners failed to cure procedural defects identified in the office report dated 23.1.2014 within two weeks, the special leave petition would stand dismissed. The case was kept conditionally alive pending compliance with the Court's directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case