RAMESH SAGGAR . vs SATYA PAL GARG . — C.A. No. 1739/2010

Case under Section IV. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010219522008

Filing Date

02-Aug-2008

Registration No

C.A. No. 1739/2010

Diary Number

21952/2008

Order Date

15-Feb-2010

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Allowed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section IV

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMESH SAGGAR .

    Adv. KAILASH CHAND (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SATYA PAL GARG .

    Adv. R. D. UPADHYAY (Dead / Retired / Elevated) C. N. SREE KUMAR (Dead / Retired / Elevated)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 24-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 12-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 05-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 29-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 11-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 18-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 02-Aug-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1739/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 001739/2010 (Ramesh Saggar v. Satya Pal Garg) Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside all lower court orders insofar as the appellants (Ramesh Saggar and others) were concerned. The Court found no evidence that the appellants had authorized Ritesh Saggar (Managing Partner) to make the false statements for which criminal proceedings were initiated against them under Sections 191/193 IPC and Section 340 read with Section 195 Cr.P.C. Reasoning: While the respondents argued that Ritesh Saggar's statements would bind all partners of the partnership firm, the Court held that absent proof of authorization, individual partners cannot be held criminally liable for statements made by the Managing Partner alone, particularly in criminal matters requiring clear evidence of personal culpability. Next Steps: The criminal proceedings against the appellants were terminated; however, proceedings against Ritesh Saggar individually could continue before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Fatehgarh Sahib. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case