SHANTI PRASAD (D) THR. LRS. vs THAKUR DASS (D) THR. LRS. — C.A. No. 5981/2014
Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010216742010
Filing Date
14-Jul-2010
Registration No
C.A. No. 5981/2014
Diary Number
21674/2010
Order Date
01-Mar-2023
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2023 INSC 185
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHANTI PRASAD (D) THR. LRS.
Adv. DINESH KUMAR GARG
Respondent(s)
-
1.THAKUR DASS (D) THR. LRS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Mar-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Mar-2023
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Mar-2023
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar
-
23-Aug-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Aug-2021
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (J-II)
-
23-Aug-2021
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (J-II)
-
12-Jul-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jul-2021
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (A-J)
-
02-Nov-2020
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Nov-2020
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Ramasubramanian
-
18-Sep-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Sep-2017
Ordinary
Registrar (A-J)
-
18-Aug-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Aug-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-May-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-May-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jan-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Jan-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Nov-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Nov-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jan-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jan-2016
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Jul-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Dec-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jul-2010
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 5981/2014
Case Summary: C.A. No. 005981/2014 On 01-03-2023, the Supreme Court (Justices Manoj Misra and Aravind Kumar) heard the appeal of Shanti Prasad's legal representatives against Thakur Dass's legal representatives. The appellant's counsel was present while no representative appeared for the respondents, with service deemed sufficient. The Court allowed the appeal to the extent specified in the signed order, with no costs awarded and any interim orders discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts