T.NADU ELECT.BOARDAND ORS. vs K.SUBRAMAIAM — C.A. No. 1083/2012

Case under Service Laws : Appointment, Compassionate Appointment, Temporary Appointment, Recruitment,probation and Confirmation, Suspension, Reduction in Rank, Termination, Dismissal, Removal, Retirement, Disciplinary Proceedings Against Employees Section XII-B. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010216332009

Filing Date

23-Jul-2009

Registration No

C.A. No. 1083/2012

Diary Number

21633/2009

Order Date

17-Jan-2024

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Service Laws : Appointment, Compassionate appointment, temporary appointment, recruitment,probation and confirmation, suspension, reduction in rank, termination, dismissal, removal, retirement, disciplinary proceedings against employees Section XII-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.T.NADU ELECT.BOARDAND ORS.

    Adv. VINODH KANNA B.[P-1] [Gr] D.KUMANAN[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.K.SUBRAMAIAM

    Adv. S. GOWTHAMAN[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jan-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 17-Jan-2024

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan

  4. 21-Aug-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 21-Aug-2023

    IA

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol

  6. 27-Mar-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 27-Mar-2023

    IA

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra

  8. 22-Mar-2023

    IA

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath

  9. 16-Feb-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 16-Feb-2023

    IA

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar

  11. 20-Apr-2022

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 20-Apr-2022

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath

  13. 09-Mar-2021

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 09-Mar-2021

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta

  15. 04-Mar-2021

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy

  16. 03-Mar-2021

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy

  17. 02-Mar-2021

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy

  18. 03-Feb-2021

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 03-Feb-2021

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Subhash Reddy

  20. 29-Aug-2018

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 29-Aug-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 01-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 01-Apr-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 01-Apr-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 20-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 16-Dec-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 08-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 11-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 19-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 17-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 16-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 05-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 27-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 12-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 03-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  36. 13-Aug-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  37. 23-Jul-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 1083/2012

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 1083/2012 Tamil Nadu Electricity Board v. K. Subramaniam The Supreme Court dismissed the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board's appeal challenging the High Court's reduction of disciplinary penalty. The original removal-from-service order (1998) was converted to compulsory retirement by the Single Judge (2008), finding the respondents' 30+ years of unblemished service warranted a lesser penalty. The Division Bench affirmed this decision (2009). The Supreme Court declined interference, citing the substantial passage of time (26 years since original penalty), and dismissed the appeals with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case