VALECHA ENGINEERING LTD.. AND M. VENKATARAO (JOINT VENTURE) THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY JAGDISH K. VALECHAD vs COMMR.OF CUS/(IMPORT) . — C.A. No. 1022/2014
Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010021582010
Filing Date
21-Jan-2010
Registration No
C.A. No. 1022/2014
Diary Number
2158/2010
Order Date
04-Nov-2019
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VALECHA ENGINEERING LTD.. AND M. VENKATARAO (JOINT VENTURE) THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY JAGDISH K. VALECHAD
Adv. K. L. JANJANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.COMMR.OF CUS/(IMPORT) .
Adv. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Nov-2019
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Nov-2019
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah
-
28-Nov-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
28-Nov-2018
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud
-
04-Oct-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Oct-2018
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (A-J)
-
16-Aug-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Aug-2018
Fixed Date by Court
Registrar (J-IV)
-
03-Jul-2018
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Jul-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jan-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Jan-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Oct-2013
ROPView PDF
-
04-Sep-2013
ROPView PDF
-
18-Jul-2013
ROPView PDF
-
09-May-2013
ROPView PDF
-
12-Apr-2013
ROPView PDF
-
14-Nov-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Jul-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-May-2011
ROPView PDF
-
13-Apr-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Mar-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Nov-2010
ROPView PDF
-
23-Sep-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Apr-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Feb-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Jan-2010
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 1022/2014
Case Summary: C.A. No. 1022/2014 Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed Civil Appeals 1022/2014, 1023/2014, 1025/2014, 1026/2014, and 1027/2014 for non-prosecution on November 4, 2019. Only CA No. 1024/2014 was permitted to proceed after the appellant filed the required affidavit of valuation and paid the deficit court fee; a 145-day delay was condoned. The other appellants failed to comply with the court's earlier directive to file affidavits and pay court fees within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts