DIRECTOR OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE . vs SHAHIDKHAN . — Crl.A. No. 608 - 611/2002

Case under Section II. Status: DISPOSED.

CNR: SCIN010213402001

DISPOSED

Filing Date

05-Dec-2001

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 608 - 611/2002

Diary Number

21340/2001

Order Date

03-May-2011

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Data as of 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II

Petitioner(s)

DIRECTOR OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE .

Adv. D. MAHESH BABU B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Respondent(s)

SHAHIDKHAN .

Adv. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES ABHISHEK ATREY

Orders

03-May-2011 ROP - of Main Case
29-Mar-2011 ROP - of Main Case
27-Jan-2011 ROP - of Main Case
27-Jan-2011 ROP - of Main Case
26-Oct-2010 ROP - of Main Case
20-Oct-2010 ROP - of Main Case
19-Oct-2010 ROP - of Main Case
19-Oct-2010 ROP - of Main Case
07-Oct-2009 ROP - of Main Case
08-Sep-2009 ROP - of Main Case
11-Aug-2009 ROP - of Main Case
16-Apr-2009 ROP - of Main Case
04-Feb-2009 ROP - of Main Case
15-Nov-2007 ROP - of Main Case
07-Jun-2007 ROP - of Main Case
16-Apr-2007 ROP - of Main Case
23-Feb-2007 ROP - of Main Case
06-Feb-2007 ROP - of Main Case
24-Nov-2006 ROP - of Main Case
24-Jul-2006 ROP - of Main Case
26-Sep-2005 ROP - of Main Case
25-Jul-2005 ROP - of Main Case
14-Jul-2005 ROP - of Main Case
09-Aug-2004 ROP - of Main Case
23-Feb-2004 ROP - of Main Case
27-Jan-2004 ROP - of Main Case
22-Oct-2002 ROP - of Main Case
19-Aug-2002 ROP - of Main Case
22-Jul-2002 ROP - of Main Case
08-May-2002 ROP - of Main Case
08-Apr-2002 ROP - of Main Case
25-Feb-2002 ROP - of Main Case
25-Jan-2002 ROP - of Main Case
View Full Judgment
casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Director of Revenue Intelligence v. Shahid Khan (Crl.A. No. 608-611/2002) The Supreme Court dismissed the Director of Revenue Intelligence's appeals challenging the High Court's acquittal of respondents in a major narcotics case. The case involved a 1995 search that seized 163.47 kg of mathequalone tablets from carpet rolls and 186.75 kg from wooden packages across four Hyderabad locations, with charges under the NDPS Act. While the trial court convicted all accused, the High Court acquitted them primarily on grounds of non-compliance with Section 42(2) of the NDPS Act. The Supreme Court upheld the acquittals, finding total non-compliance: the investigating officer (PW.1) admitted he did not record the intelligence information in writing or forward it to superiors as mandated. The Court applied the Constitution Bench ruling in Kamal Singh v. State of Haryana (2009), holding that such total non-compliance vitiates convictions. The appeals were dismissed without addressing other contentions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Supreme Court of India All courts →

Explore other courts

High Courts District Courts
Search Another Case