NTPC LTD. vs M/S. DECONAR SERVICES PVT. LTD. — C.A. No. 6483/2014
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010212772010
Filing Date
12-Jul-2010
Registration No
C.A. No. 6483/2014
Diary Number
21277/2010
Order Date
04-Mar-2021
Document Type
Judgement - of Main Case
Neutral Citation
2021 INSC 148
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NTPC LTD.
Adv. PUNEET TANEJA (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/S. DECONAR SERVICES PVT. LTD.
Adv. S. RAJAPPA[Caveat]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Mar-2021
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Mar-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Mar-2021
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose
-
24-Feb-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Feb-2021
Fixed Date by Court
Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose
-
18-Feb-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Feb-2021
Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week
Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose
-
10-Feb-2021
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Feb-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-May-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-May-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-May-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jul-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
18-Feb-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Aug-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jul-2010
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 6483/2014
-
[ 2021 INSC 148 ]
Judgement - of Main CaseView PDF
Case Summary: NTPC Ltd. v. M/s Deconar Services Pvt. Ltd. The Supreme Court dismissed NTPC's appeals challenging an arbitrator's awards totaling approximately Rs. 48 lakhs to contractor Deconar for construction delays. The Court upheld the arbitrator's interpretation that the 16% rebate was conditional on simultaneous execution of both projects, and that price escalation applied beyond the scheduled period since NTPC delayed site handover—holding courts cannot reappraise arbitral awards when arbitrators take reasonable, possible views supported by evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts