NISHA SURESH vs UCO BANK SAMBALPUR BRANCH — C.A. No. 8347/2011
Case under Banking : Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Debt Recovery by Banks, Financial Institutions, Cooperative Banks and Negotiable Instruments [Other Than Criminal Prosecution] Section XI-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010211692010
Filing Date
12-Jul-2010
Registration No
C.A. No. 8347/2011
Diary Number
21169/2010
Order Date
11-Sep-2025
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Appeals Allowed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NISHA SURESH
Adv. M. SARADA
Respondent(s)
-
1.UCO BANK SAMBALPUR BRANCH
Adv. RAJESH SINGH[R-1] RAJESH SINGH[R-2] SUSHIL BALWADA[R-3]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Sep-2025
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Sep-2025
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Joymalya Bagchi
-
10-Sep-2025
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vijay Bishnoi
-
21-Aug-2025
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Augustine George Masih
-
07-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Oct-2014
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jan-2011
ROPView PDF
-
14-Jan-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Nov-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Oct-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
13-Jul-2010
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Jul-2010
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 8347/2011
Case Summary: Nisha Suresh v. UCO Bank Sambalpur Branch (C.A. 8347/2011) The Supreme Court allowed appeals by auction purchaser Nisha Suresh and UCO Bank, setting aside the High Court's June 2010 order. The High Court had permitted borrowers of Hirakud Rice Mill to retain mortgaged property by paying outstanding dues (₹1.43 crores) in four installments over six months, granting them "breathing time" despite an auction sale already completed. The Court held the High Court lacked authority to extend such indulgence contrary to the SARFAESI Act, as borrowers failed to exercise redemption rights before the sale date and were not ready with full payment when the petition was heard. The sale certificate issued to Nisha Suresh on January 4, 2010, stands valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts