MUNIR MEHABUB PALKAR vs MUKHTAR RAJJAK KHATIK . — C.A. No. 3489/2010

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010211232008

Filing Date

28-Jul-2008

Registration No

C.A. No. 3489/2010

Diary Number

21123/2008

Order Date

16-Jan-2020

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUNIR MEHABUB PALKAR

    Adv. ABHA R. SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUKHTAR RAJJAK KHATIK .

    Adv. ASHA GOPALAN NAIR NIRNIMESH DUBE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jan-2020

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 16-Jan-2020

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.R. Gavai and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant

  4. 25-Oct-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 21-Mar-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 09-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 23-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 11-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 30-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 26-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 14-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 17-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 11-May-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 16-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 04-Mar-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 27-Jan-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 08-Dec-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 10-Nov-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 13-Oct-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 28-Jul-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 3489/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 003489/2010 On January 16, 2020, a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India heard the civil appeal filed by Munir Mehabub Palkar against Mukhtar Rajjak Khatik and others. After hearing arguments from counsel for both parties and reviewing the case records, the Court found the appeal to be devoid of merit and dismissed it accordingly. No further directions or next steps were mentioned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case