AMOL BHASKARRAO WAGHMARE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA HOME DEPARMENT STATION HOUSE OFFICER — Crl.A. No. 744/2011

Case under Section II-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010209922010

Filing Date

08-Jul-2010

Registration No

Crl.A. No. 744/2011

Diary Number

20992/2010

Order Date

07-Jun-2023

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Appeals Allowed

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section II-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMOL BHASKARRAO WAGHMARE

    Adv. NIRNIMESH DUBE[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA HOME DEPARMENT STATION HOUSE OFFICER

    Adv. AADITYA ANIRUDDHA PANDE[R-1]

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Jun-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 07-Jun-2023

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal

  4. 01-Jun-2023

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra

  5. 23-Feb-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 23-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 15-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 15-Mar-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 21-Jan-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 18-Oct-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 13-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 08-Jul-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A. No. 744/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Crl.A. No. 744/2011 – Amol Bhaskarrao Waghmare v. State of Maharashtra Outcome: The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and acquitted the appellant on June 7, 2023. The Court set aside the High Court's judgment affirming conviction and the Trial Court's conviction order, finding insufficient evidence against Waghmare for murder (Section 302) and causing injury (Section 307) charges in connection with a April 2003 incident in Akola. The appellant was discharged from bail. Key Finding: The Court determined Waghmare's conviction was "unwarranted," relying solely on a stray cross-examination reference by the injured eyewitness who admitted naming Waghmare only during trial, not in initial investigation or FIR statements. No specific role was attributed to him in charge framing or trial court proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case