MADHYA PRADESH LAGHU UDYOG NIGAM MARYADIT vs SUBODH GADKARI — C.A. No. 7087/2010

Case under Section III. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010209422007

Filing Date

21-Jul-2007

Registration No

C.A. No. 7087/2010

Diary Number

20942/2007

Order Date

20-Sep-2023

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MADHYA PRADESH LAGHU UDYOG NIGAM MARYADIT

    Adv. B. S. BANTHIA (Dead / Retired / Elevated) VIKRANT SINGH BAIS[P-1]

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUBODH GADKARI

    Adv. SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Sep-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 20-Sep-2023

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.V. Viswanathan

  4. 02-Aug-2023

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 02-Aug-2023

    After Week/Month/Vacation

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.V. Viswanathan

  6. 02-Mar-2022

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 02-Mar-2022

    Fixed Date by Court

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose

  8. 02-Feb-2022

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 02-Feb-2022

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose

  10. 01-Feb-2022

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose

  11. 16-Dec-2021

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose

  12. 09-Dec-2021

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose

  13. 08-Dec-2021

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose

  14. 07-Dec-2021

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose

  15. 02-Dec-2021

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aniruddha Bose

  16. 18-Feb-2020

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 18-Feb-2020

    IA

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao

  18. 21-Oct-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 21-Oct-2019

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.R. Shah

  20. 23-Jan-2019

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 23-Jan-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 23-Jan-2019

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran

  23. 12-May-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  24. 12-May-2016

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 12-May-2016

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 26-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  27. 26-Nov-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 24-Nov-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  29. 25-Aug-2015

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 25-Aug-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 06-May-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 25-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  33. 25-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 16-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  35. 05-Apr-2010
  36. 23-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  37. 22-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  38. 04-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  39. 01-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  40. 01-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  41. 12-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  42. 04-Dec-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  43. 16-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  44. 07-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  45. 29-Apr-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  46. 11-Sep-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  47. 07-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  48. 25-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  49. 16-Nov-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  50. 21-Sep-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  51. 21-Jul-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 7087/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of C.A. No. 007087/2010 The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by Madhya Pradesh Laghu Udyog Nigam and the State of Madhya Pradesh challenging the High Court's quashing of orders that reduced pay scales for promoted Managers Class-II from 2200-4000 to 2000-3500. The Court upheld the High Court's finding that since promoted and directly-recruited Managers Class-II perform identical duties without qualification differences, the pay disparity was unjustified. All pending applications were disposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case