BHAG SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY — Crl.A. No. 1485/2009
Case under Section II-B. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010207292008
Filing Date
03-Jun-2008
Registration No
Crl.A. No. 1485/2009
Diary Number
20729/2008
Order Date
03-Aug-2017
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHAG SINGH
Adv. ABHA R. SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY
Adv. KULDIP SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Aug-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Aug-2017
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
-
02-Aug-2017
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
-
01-Aug-2017
After Week/Month/Vacation
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
-
26-May-2017
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-May-2017
Ordinary
Hon'ble Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha
-
24-May-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-May-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Feb-2014
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Mar-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
25-Feb-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Jul-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
24-Apr-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
09-Feb-2009
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Jun-2008
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A. No. 1485/2009
Case Summary: Bhag Singh & Ors. v. State of Punjab Outcome: The Supreme Court set aside the convictions and life sentences of three appellants (Bhag Singh, Baj Singh, and Bagicha Singh) for murder, kidnapping, and related offences under IPC Sections 302, 364, 201, and 148/149. The Court found the circumstantial evidence insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and directed their immediate release. Key Findings: The Court identified critical infirmities in the prosecution's case: identical disclosure statements lacked credibility, the alleged extra-judicial confession was actually hearsay, the wooden staff recovered from one accused matched no post-mortem injuries, and personal belongings recovered from two accused were unidentified. The Court held that motive alone cannot sustain conviction without corroborating evidence. Judgment Date: August 3, 2017 This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts