M/S INDIAN CHARGE CHROME LTD. . vs UNION OF INDIA . — T.P.(C) No. 928/2005
Case under Section XII-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010202082005
Filing Date
16-Sep-2005
Registration No
T.P.(C) No. 928/2005
Diary Number
20208/2005
Order Date
09-Jan-2007
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Allowed
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S INDIAN CHARGE CHROME LTD. .
Adv. B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA .
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Jan-2007
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Dec-2006
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Dec-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Aug-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Aug-2006
ROPView PDF
-
28-Jul-2006
ROPView PDF
-
25-Jul-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
19-Jul-2006
ROPView PDF
-
02-May-2006
ROPView PDF
-
20-Mar-2006
ROPView PDF
-
20-Feb-2006
ROPView PDF
-
16-Jan-2006
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Nov-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
06-Oct-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Sep-2005
Case filed
Registration No. T.P.(C) No. 928/2005
-
17-Aug-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
05-Aug-2005
ROPView PDF
-
27-Jul-2005
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
11-Jul-2005
ROPView PDF
-
17-Feb-2005
ROPView PDF
-
11-Oct-2004
ROPView PDF
-
28-Sep-2004
ROPView PDF
-
08-Mar-2004
ROPView PDF
-
12-Sep-2003
ROPView PDF
-
29-Aug-2003
ROPView PDF
-
17-Dec-2002
Judgment - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Dec-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Nov-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jul-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-May-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
29-Apr-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Apr-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Feb-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Jan-2002
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Dec-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Oct-2001
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
On 11/12/2006, the Supreme Court bench of Chief Justice Y.K. Sabharwal, Justice C.K. Thakker, and Justice P.K. Balasubramanyan rendered judgment in this consolidated case involving Indian Charge Chrome Ltd. and others against the Union of India. The Court allowed the appeals of the State of Orissa and OMC, partially allowed I.C.C.L. and GMR's appeals by setting aside the lease grant to Nava Bharat, and allowed all Transfer Petitions. The matter was disposed of with each party bearing their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts