THE SECRETARY CUM CHAIRMAN, STANDING COMMITTEE,ESIC vs SH. G. C. JATAV — C.A. No. 3440 - 3441/2012
Case under Section XIV-A. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010199972011
Filing Date
04-Jul-2011
Registration No
C.A. No. 3440 - 3441/2012
Diary Number
19997/2011
Order Date
03-Aug-2023
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Disposed Off
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE SECRETARY CUM CHAIRMAN, STANDING COMMITTEE,ESIC
Adv. SANTOSH KRISHNAN[P-1] SANTOSH KRISHNAN[P-2] SANTOSH KRISHNAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.SH. G. C. JATAV
Adv. ASHA JAIN MADAN[R-1]
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Aug-2023
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
03-Aug-2023
Ordinary
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
-
10-Aug-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Aug-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Aug-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jul-2015
Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF
-
23-Jul-2015
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Apr-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
27-Jan-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
01-Dec-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
30-Sep-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
08-Aug-2011
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
04-Jul-2011
Case filed
Registration No. C.A. No. 3440 - 3441/2012
Case Summary: ESIC v. G.C. Jatav (C.A. 3440-3441/2012) The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's judgment reinstating respondent G.C. Jatav, an ESIC employee dismissed for alleged bribery. ESIC failed to establish its case with cogent evidence, as key witness G.R. Baru was not produced, the alleged ₹5,000 envelope was not recovered, and the complainant denied money was demanded. The Court found the dismissal order unsustainable and directed reinstatement with consequential benefits (though without back wages), waiving only ₹35,000 in costs previously imposed on ESIC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts