BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. . vs ABDUR RAHMAN . — C.A. No. 7948/2013

Case under Section III-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010019762007

Filing Date

16-Jan-2007

Registration No

C.A. No. 7948/2013

Diary Number

1976/2007

Order Date

10-Sep-2013

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Dismissed

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. .

    Adv. PAVAN KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ABDUR RAHMAN .

    Adv. ABHISTH KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 15-Jul-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  4. 29-Apr-2013
  5. 15-Jan-2013
  6. 04-Apr-2012
  7. 01-Mar-2012
  8. 21-Feb-2012
  9. 09-Jan-2012
  10. 08-Nov-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 27-Sep-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 20-Sep-2010
  13. 06-Sep-2010
  14. 25-Aug-2010
  15. 12-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 19-Oct-2009
  17. 27-Jul-2009
  18. 13-May-2009
  19. 31-Mar-2009
  20. 06-Feb-2009
  21. 23-Oct-2008
  22. 18-Sep-2008
  23. 05-Sep-2008
  24. 20-Aug-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  25. 23-Jul-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  26. 11-Jul-2008
  27. 28-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  28. 04-Apr-2008
  29. 03-Apr-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  30. 04-Mar-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  31. 07-Feb-2008

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  32. 17-Jan-2008
  33. 11-Dec-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  34. 20-Nov-2007
  35. 26-Oct-2007
  36. 05-Oct-2007
  37. 05-Oct-2007
  38. 17-Sep-2007
  39. 07-Sep-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  40. 15-May-2007
  41. 09-Apr-2007
  42. 19-Mar-2007

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  43. 16-Jan-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 7948/2013

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.A. No. 7948/2013 (BSNL v. Abdur Rahman) Outcome: The Supreme Court dismissed BSNL's appeals without costs. The Court upheld the High Court's decision to quash BSNL's cancellation orders of employee promotions to Grade IV under the Biennial Cadre Review Scheme. Key Facts: Respondent employees were promoted to Grade IV in 1998-99 but BSNL cancelled these promotions after they had served ~one year, claiming they were made contrary to promotion criteria. The High Court found the cancellations unjustified and inequitable, noting most respondents had already retired or passed away before cancellation orders. Reasoning: The Court held that employees who worked in the higher grade without being responsible for the promotion irregularity could not be reverted without lawful justification, especially when BSNL itself had created supernumerary posts to accommodate them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case