UTTARKHAND RAJYA SAHAKARI SANGH LTD. REP. THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN vs M/S KIKILESHWAR MINING CO. REP. THROUGH ITS PARTNER SATEY SINGH RANA — C.A. No. 10316/2011

Case under Mines Minerals, Mining Leases : Grant/renewal And/or Cancellation of Reconnaissance Permits, Prospecting Licenses And/or Mining Leases, Payment of Royalty Under Any Central or State Statute Section III-A. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010196542010

Filing Date

02-Jul-2010

Registration No

C.A. No. 10316/2011

Diary Number

19654/2010

Order Date

15-Feb-2024

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Mines Minerals, Mining leases : Grant/renewal and/or cancellation of reconnaissance permits, prospecting licenses and/or mining leases, payment of royalty under any Central or State statute Section III-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UTTARKHAND RAJYA SAHAKARI SANGH LTD. REP. THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN

    Adv. VIVEK SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S KIKILESHWAR MINING CO. REP. THROUGH ITS PARTNER SATEY SINGH RANA

    Adv. SANJAY JAIN[Caveat] GAURAV KEJRIWAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Feb-2024

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 15-Feb-2024

    Ordinary

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan

  4. 25-Feb-2015

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 28-Feb-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 26-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 19-Nov-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 21-Nov-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 23-Aug-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 07-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 18-Apr-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 21-Feb-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 02-Jul-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 10316/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: On February 15, 2024, the Supreme Court disposed of Civil Appeal No. 10316/2011 between Uttarkhand Rajya Sahakari Sangh Ltd. and M/S Kikileshwar Mining Co. The court found that the mining lease duration had expired during the pendency of the appeal, rendering the dispute moot. Accordingly, the bench of Justices Abhay S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan disposed of the appeal and all pending applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case