BAVI PAPI REDDY BARRENKA vs HIS EXCELLENCY GOVERNER OF A.P.. — W.P.(C) No. 46/2012
Case under Section X. Status: Disposed.
CNR: SCIN010018932012
Filing Date
16-Jan-2012
Registration No
W.P.(C) No. 46/2012
Diary Number
1893/2012
Order Date
12-Sep-2013
Document Type
ROP - of Main Case
Disposal Type
Dismissed
Last updated 04-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BAVI PAPI REDDY BARRENKA
Adv. Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.HIS EXCELLENCY GOVERNER OF A.P..
Adv. P. VINAY KUMAR GUNNAM VENKATESWARA RAO G. N. REDDY TATINI BASU SRIDHAR POTARAJU (Dead / Retired / Elevated)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Sep-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
22-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
21-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
14-Aug-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
15-Jul-2013
ROPView PDF
-
04-Jul-2013
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Apr-2013
ROPView PDF
-
10-Apr-2013
ROPView PDF
-
12-Mar-2013
ROPView PDF
-
22-Feb-2013
ROPView PDF
-
18-Feb-2013
ROPView PDF
-
15-Feb-2013
ROPView PDF
-
07-Jan-2013
ROPView PDF
-
04-Dec-2012
ROPView PDF
-
21-Nov-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
12-Oct-2012
ROPView PDF
-
01-Oct-2012
ROPView PDF
-
01-Oct-2012
ROPView PDF
-
25-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
10-Sep-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
07-Aug-2012
ROPView PDF
-
03-Aug-2012
ROPView PDF
-
20-Jul-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
02-May-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
26-Mar-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
17-Feb-2012
ROP - of Main CaseView PDF
-
16-Jan-2012
Case filed
Registration No. W.P.(C) No. 46/2012
Summary of W.P.(C) No. 46/2012 - Bavi Papi Reddy Barrenka v. Governor of A.P. The petitioner's writ petition challenging the Andhra Pradesh High Court's judgment on judicial appointments was dismissed as withdrawn by consent on September 12, 2013. Simultaneously, related Special Leave Petitions were granted and disposed without merit adjudication. The Court approved a settlement whereby petitioner B. Papi Reddy and three others were adjusted as Additional District & Sessions Judges with service continuity from original appointment dates, while a fifth candidate required creation of an additional post within specified timeframes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts