ASHARFI MEHTA vs CHANCELLOR OF THE UNIV.OF BIHAR — C.A. No. 5874/2012

Case under Section XVI. Status: Disposed.

Disposed

CNR: SCIN010187632009

Filing Date

03-Jul-2009

Registration No

C.A. No. 5874/2012

Diary Number

18763/2009

Order Date

11-Feb-2021

Document Type

ROP - of Main Case

Disposal Type

Disposed Off

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Section XVI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHARFI MEHTA

    Adv. AMIT PAWAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHANCELLOR OF THE UNIV.OF BIHAR

    Adv. MANU SHANKER MISHRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Feb-2021

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  3. 11-Feb-2021

    Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna

  4. 16-Jul-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  5. 04-Apr-2014

    Office Report - of Main CaseView PDF

  6. 04-Apr-2014

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  7. 11-Sep-2013

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  8. 09-Aug-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  9. 03-Jul-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  10. 04-May-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  11. 13-Jan-2012

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  12. 28-Jul-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  13. 05-May-2011

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  14. 20-Aug-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  15. 12-Apr-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  16. 23-Mar-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  17. 16-Feb-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  18. 07-Jan-2010

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  19. 04-Nov-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  20. 08-Oct-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  21. 29-Sep-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  22. 27-Jul-2009

    ROP - of Main CaseView PDF

  23. 03-Jul-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.A. No. 5874/2012

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: C.A. No. 005874/2012 - Asharfi Mehta v. Chancellor of University of Bihar On 11 February 2021, the Supreme Court (Justices S. Abdul Nazeer and Sanjiv Khanna) heard the appeal and disposed of it as infructuous after the appellant's counsel informed the Court that the appellant had retired from service. Since the appellant's retirement eliminated the subject matter of the appeal, the Court found it no longer survivable and dismissed it along with all pending applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case